Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Why Can’t a Muslim lady Marry a Non-Muslim Man? | Islamic Girls Guide

Why Can’t a Muslim lady Marry a Non-Muslim Man?

Why Can’t a Muslim lady Marry a Non-Muslim Man? | Islamic Girls Guide
Why-Can’t-a-Muslim-lady-Marry-a-Non-Muslim-Man? | Islamic Girls Guide




Every lady appearance forwards to her day, to her dress, to new beginnings; really, not all women. A Muslim lady gazing at her gown, simply learning that her wedding to a non-Muslim isn't allowed in Islam, is torn between her faith and love. Why wouldn’t Islam permit such a wedding, anyway?



Love initially sight, this fulminant and involuntary attraction, jolts those touched by it. Staying awake throughout the nights, forgetting appointments, and reverie at work, all fall into symptoms of affection. whereas love appears to shelf rationality, onlookers sometimes respond with a chuckle: “never mind, they're loving.”


Lovebirds ought to fly where they want. inserting laws on them would be like binding them in a cage. Why ought to 2 individuals loving not to be able to pay the remainder of their lives together? an easy argument, thus it should appear.



Logically, we will (1) permit all marriages to occur or (2) we will permit some to occur and require some or (3) we will require marriages altogether.



If we have a tendency to take the primary possibility, permitting all marriages to occur with no restrictions, it might embody situations sort of a person marrying their full cousin or kinswoman.



While these situations might cause some to cringe, others might not. If you're a Hebrew, you're smart to travel as a result of Judaism provides a person the liberty to marry his kinswoman.


Marriage and Cultural Norms





While {it may|it's going to|it ought to} sound sort of a romantic concept that anyone should be able to marry anyone, bushed the name of affection and freedom, it will invite contempt in several societies.

Cousin marriages, for instance, square measure incestuous, about thought-about in some cultures, just like the Chinese and Korean, however square measure legal in Hinduism, Judaism, Islam; Europe, Canada, and components of u.  s.



Advocates for the liberty of lovebirds can get to take into thought that permitting all marriages includes even those ensuing from accordant relationships between brother and sister, or father and female offspring. can they permit such marriages, since purportedly, love ought to not be restricted or regulated?

If we have a tendency to entertain the second possibility, permitting some marriages and disallowing some, we are going to got to answer the plain question, United Nations agency can categorize for the lovebirds that marriages square measure allowed and disallowed?

“The People”, it seems would be the most effective answer. Societies live by standards of behavior known as social norms and mores.

Marriage and faith


The Old Testament prohibits marrying individuals of alternative faiths, in order that they won't be turned far from God nor receive His punishment:

“Do not conjoin with them. don't provide your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons for they'll flip your kids far from following American state to serve alternative gods, and therefore the Lord’s anger can burn against you and can quickly destroy you.” (Deuteronomy 7:3,4)

In addition, per human law, the kids of a gentile lady don't seem to be thought-about to be human albeit the husband is also human. For the kids to be thought-about humans, the mother should be human.

In Islam, the prohibition to marry individuals of alternative faiths conjointly exists:

{And don't marry polytheistic girls till they believe. And a basic cognitive process slave lady is healthier than a polytheist, albeit she may please you. And don't marry polytheistic men [to your women] till they believe. And a basic cognitive process slave is healthier than a polytheist, albeit he may please you. Those invite [you] to the hearth, however Allah invitations to Paradise and to forgiveness, by His permission. And He makes clear His verses to the folks that maybe they will bear in mind.} (Quran 2:221)

The previous verse prohibiting marriages to individuals of alternative faiths describes them as, “mushrik” and “mushrik”, which means females and males United Nations agency commit “shirk”- the antithesis of theism, loosely translated as “polytheist”.

According to the excellent understanding of theism in Islam, only 1 God ought to be idolized while not equalization His lordship and identity to creation. Jews and Christians square measure seen to possess compromised tenets of theism and square measure enclosed within the wedding prohibition mentioned within the previous verse. The sacred text describes their compromise to monotheism:

students and monks as lords besides Allah, and conjointly the Messiah, the son of Madonna. and that they weren't commanded except to worship one God; there's no spiritual being except Him. Exalted is He higher than no matter they keep company with Him.} (Quran 9:31)

{And don't say, “Three”; abstain – it's higher for you. Indeed, Allah is, however, one God. Exalted is He higher than having a son. To Him belongs no matter is within the heavens and no matter is on the planet. And enough is Allah as Disposer of affairs.} (Quran 4:171)

However, in contrast to Judaism, that maintained the wedding prohibition for each male and females, Islam later allowed males to marry feminine Jews and Christians:

{And [lawful in the wedding are] chaste girls from among the believers and chaste girls from among those that got the Scripture before you, after you have given them their due compensation, needing chastity, not unlawful sexual issues nor taking secret lovers.} (Quran 5:5)

Some efforts to rationalize this unilateral admissibility of weddings appear to lack strength. If the worry that a Muslim lady marrying a non-Muslim man will be turned far from God is the rationalization, then an equivalent will be the same regarding the Muslim male married to a Hebrew or Christian.

Both Quranic and Old Testament verses that prohibited wedding to alternative faiths explicit a rationalization- to not be turned far from God. However, the Quranic verse, stating the admissibility for a person to marry a human or Christian lady, failed to mention a rationalization.

Of course, this is often to not say that rationalization cannot exist just because one wasn't mentioned. But, it will indicate that the mistreatment of the rationalization from the verse with the universal prohibition for the verse with the unilateral admissibility would be incorrect.

Likewise, misconstrued rationalizations for verses in each the Old Testament and therefore the sacred text, like claiming the verses entail discrimination or unequal treatment of ladies conjointly have to be compelled to be rejected as they are doing not coincide with the spirit nor the letter of either law severally.

However, the rationalization place forth that a Muslim lady is protected whereas married to a Muslim man by her monotheism rights, just like the right to property possession, the correct to her identity (not dynamic her name), the correct to vote, the correct to not war any monetary burdens of the family if she thus needs, the correct to inheritance, etc, appears to be a powerful one, and even stronger within the past once girls hardly had rights.

But, it will be argued societies have currently fixed on many women’s rights, thus why wouldn’t such a wedding be permissible today?

The question has truly supported the assumption that the knowledge of rulings performs just like the reasons and objectives of rulings, that in fact isn't the case. The absence of knowledge doesn't legitimatize the overturning of a ruling in monotheism jurisprudence.

For example, the knowledge for shortening prayers throughout travel is to accommodate for the issue. However, if an expensive vacation is taken, it's not a reason to require the shortening of prayer. The presence of an issue could be known for shortening the prayer, not the rationale. the rationale is travel.

Likewise, the protection of the Muslim female’s rights in the wedding could be knowledge, not the rationale for the unilateral admissibility. Therefore, albeit a non-Muslim male will guarantee a Muslim feminine her monotheism rights, the prohibition isn't turned.

The sacred text encourages believers to think and replicate their verses. At bound times, students exhausted efforts in search of the rationalizations behind rulings solely to come back to the conclusion that whereas there exists a reason for each ruling, the human intellect cannot presently clinch all of them.

Lovebirds ought to have the liberty to opt for whom they will or cannot marry per the standards of behavior they freely choose. Disallowing marriages to be regulated, within the name of freedom, solely violates the people’s freedom to decide on the laws they want to measure by.

                                                                          INDEED ALLAH KNOWS THE BEST!
                                                                       AND INDEED ALLAH KNOWS THE BEST!
                                                                 JazakAllah Khair for reading this Article,
                                                       May Allah forgive me if I'm wrong at any place, Ameen



No comments:

Post a Comment